The Scarlet Letter Morality And Morality - 1288 Words

In The Scarlet Letter, the perception of sin deviates from person to person. The deviation occurs on the severity of the sin that was committed and who committed the sin. Focusing on Hester and Dimmesdale, it is easy to compare the consequences of coping with the perception of their sins, on a private and a public level. The outcome of dealing with their sin is extremely different. The theme of morality affects Hester and Dimmesdale as well. They have varying levels of morality and this changes during the course of the novel. In terms of the book, The Scarlet Letter, the theme of morality plays a large role in the sequence of events. The question is, who has stronger morals, Hester or Dimmesdale? Hester was the one to reveal the sin, even though it was not her choice. This means that she has stronger morals because she admits to her sin and deals with the outcome of it. In Dimmesdale’s case, he does not reveal his sin, so his morals are weaker than Hester’s. In her arti cle, â€Å"A Critique of Puritan Society†, Alison Easton shares that â€Å"These people’s response is both involuntary and at one level based on a misapprehension of the true state of affairs† (119). The only reason that Dimmesdale was seen as morally stronger was because of his position as a priest. They were manipulated to believe that he was not a sinner at all. At the end of the book, Dimmesdale’s morality increased because of his guilty heart, and because of this, he admits to his sin and dies on the scaffold.Show MoreRelated Morality in Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter Essay2124 Words   |  9 PagesMorality in The Scarlet Letter      Ã‚   ...pain is in itself an evil; and indeed, without exception, the only evil; or else the words good and evil have no meaning. (Chase 127) In the novel The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne presents a very clear view of his stand on morality, which he carefully cultivates through the course of the story. The moral, which is Be true! applies equally well to all of the characters in the novel. Though his view does seem to stand as true through the lengthRead MoreSummary Of The Scarlet Letter 1329 Words   |  6 PagesMelanie Showers Mrs. Voshell Honors English 10 8 January 2016 Morality in The Scarlet Letter In The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne describes many defining instances of different characters’ morality. Some of the characters’ opinions are very different, but the people of the town have a general morality that leads Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale to deal with their sins differently in public, than in private. First, Hester’s morality, is not very defined at the beginning. She seems as though sheRead MoreAdultery Corrupts Society Essay1142 Words   |  5 Pagescorruption of the soul, slowly eroding the morality, and ethics of a society and its people. This corruption spreads quickly to soften the opposing legal arguments, which lowers the standard for acceptable behavior, thus undermining family structures. Turley Jonathan in â€Å"The scarlet letter lives on† writes, â€Å"In the U.S., in the year 2010, people can still be prosecuted for breaching their marital vows.† Though this is a true statement, he goes on to state â€Å"morality crimes† are rarely enforced. CandisRead MoreEssay on Adultery1441 Words   |  6 Pagesto be a crime, a sin, an abomination, why is it allowed? We are responsible for slowly allowing adultery, a moral, ethical, and legal breech of contract to undermine family structures and lower the standards for acceptable behavior in society. Morality in a marriage is more than a religious concept; there is a basic understanding that to be married is a choice and thus an exclusive commitment to ones spouse. Billy Graham who is world renown for his upstanding character and Christian beliefs wasRead MoreNathaniel Hawthorne s The Scarlet Letter1896 Words   |  8 Pagesoften associated with the savages and the devil. In his work The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne finds herself exiled by society for having an adulterous affair with the town reverend which brought forth the child known as Pearl. Pearl is quickly established as the child of the wilderness: wild, capricious, and thought by the town to be a demon-child. She represents several entities in the novel just by her being, but when her morality is delved into, much more of the nature of the story can be revealedRead MoreAnalysis Of The Scarlet Letter 1307 Words   |  6 PagesJanuary 2016 The Perception of Sins in The Scarlet Letter In The Scarlet Letter, the perception of sin deviates from person to person. The deviation occurs on the severity of the sin that was committed and who committed the sin. Focusing on Hester and Dimmesdale, it is easy to compare the consequences of coping with the perception of their sins, on a private and a public level. The outcome of dealing with their sin is extremely different. The theme of morality affects Hester and Dimmesdale also. TheyRead MoreJosh Lyon. Mrs. Voshell. Honors English 10. 6 January 2017.979 Words   |  4 PagesJosh Lyon Mrs. Voshell Honors English 10 6 January 2017 Symbolism in The Scarlet Letter Within The Scarlet Letter Hawthorne uses symbolism, â€Å"the use of symbols to represent ideas† (Bell 10), affluently. The amount of symbolism Hawthorne uses could lead some to believe that The Scarlet Letter is in fact an allegory. Nearly every object in Hawthorne’s novel is symbolic. Hawthorne uses everyday objects and places to symbolize many main themes, concepts, and ideas in the lives of Hester and Pearl asRead MoreBeing Earnest By Oscar Wilde1332 Words   |  6 Pagesindirectly connected to the idea of moral ambiguity that The Scarlet Letter portrays. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s classic novel The Scarlet Letter depicts the actuality of romance, sin, and revenge rooted in the 17th century American society. Strong Puritan beliefs of the characters in The Scarlet Letter created many different forms of moral ambiguity that can be described as illustrating both good and evil. Among the characters in the Scarlet letter with such moral struggle, Dimmesdale is present ed to theRead MoreEssay on Morally Ambiguous Characters in The Scarlet Letter746 Words   |  3 PagesHawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, the deceptive Roger Chillingworth could most certainly be considered a morally ambiguous character. Throughout the novel, Roger Chillingworth everlastingly remains misleading as to whether he lies on the side of good or evil. Even at the end of The Scarlet Letter, the knowledge of Roger Chillingworth is extremely nebulous. The mysterious Roger Chillingworth, although ultimately emanating to be evil, attests to be a challenge when determining his morality. Roger ChillingworthRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Blue Neighborhood By Troye Sivan1774 Words   |  8 Pagescharacterization. Nathaniel Hawthorne s development of Pearl, Hester, and Dimmesdale in his novel, The Scarlet Letter, testifies to the complexity of human morality. Pearl serves as a reflection of reality that allows Hester and Dimmesdale to analyze their own morality in relation to the events taking place in their lives. In the first scaffold scene, Hester presses infant-Pearl to her bosom and touches the letter A on her chest â€Å"to assure herself that the infant and the shame were real† (Hawthorne 51). Hawthorne

The Ethics Around Disaster Management - 2017 Words

1. Introduction This paper will examine and discuss the ethics around disaster management, evidence based practice, and public health care in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed the wide part of New Orleans in the United States of America. 2. Hurricane Katrina Hurricane Katrina occurred on August 23, 2005, befalling in the course of seven days in Florida, along the Gulf Coast in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama initially killing between 1,300 and 2,000 people and displacing 650,000 residents, (Department of Homeland Security [DHS], 2006, p. 1; Knabb, Rhome, Brown, 2006; U.S. Department of Commerce, 2006 as cited in Lowe Rhodes, 2013, p. 398). The storm’s damage reinforced the previously ignored warnings made years prior for New Orleans and surrounding areas in need of protection from not only category 3 hurricanes, but category 4 hurricanes also, (American RadioWorks, 2002; O’Hanlon, 2002). Furthermore, the response to the disaster has been criticised such as the works of federal, state and local levels of government particularly Congress, the Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], and the Bush administration, (Boaz, 2005; Edwards, 2015). Due to the rapid development of communication and transportation technologies , a fast international response to disasters is made possible and with this comes the opportunity to sort out ethical issues that could occur in disaster relief (Gordijn Have, 2015, p. 1). When ethics is involved in a disasterShow MoreRelatedThe American Red Cross1243 Words   |  5 PagesThe American Red Cross: Management Analysis Chris Crawford, Amanda Kvedrowicz, Sarah Lawrence, Christine Moaga, Betsy Rush MGT/330 March 1, 2010 Ronald Sprague The American Red Cross: Management Analysis The American Red Cross (2010) website tells of an organization guided by the principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, and voluntary service whose mission is to, â€Å"provide relief to victims of disaster and help people prevent, prepare for, and respond to emergencies†Read MoreEssay on Challenger1108 Words   |  5 Pages On January 26, 1986, one of the greatest disasters of our time occurred. When Challenger was destroyed many questions were asked about the safety of space missions. Many questions were asked about the credibility of the engineers who designed the air craft. It is now know that crucial information about the faulty O-rings was know to many if not all of the engineers. These engineers had many moral decisions they had to face when the problem was first noticed, which was as early as NovemberRead MoreThe Structural Failure Of The Rana Plaza Collapse Essay1622 Words   |  7 Pagesdemanding change. The ethical issue involves around a Bangladesh man Sohel Rana, and western clothing companies, specifically the company it manufactured for, Canadian fashion brand Joe Fresh (Forbes, 2013). The building, Rana Plaza, was owned by Sohel Rana, whom illegally extended the six-storey building, into a nine-storey factory complex. Ethics: Ethics are principles of behaviour that distinguish between right and wrong. Resnik (2011) defines ethics as† a method, procedure, or perspective forRead MoreThe Law For Global Business1014 Words   |  5 PagesEthic Issue Paper MBA511 Law for Global Business Instructor: Robert Richards Student: Yan Gao November 10 , 2014 â€Æ' I. Question: Do multi-national corporations (MNE s) have a social and ethical responsibility beyond the legal requirements of trying to maximize stockholder value (making profits), adhering to contracts, and obeying the laws of the different countries where they operate? The rapid development of economy promotes the development of multinational companies, which have becomeRead MoreAmerican Red Cross Case Study1043 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Jpz777 04/25/2013 Order # A2092821 1.) Determine the impact of this event on ARCs benefits of business ethics (employee commitment, investor loyalty, customer satisfaction, and bottom line). In the wake of the double-edged sword caused by its scandalous mismanagement of the September 11th terrorist attacks and Hurricane Katrinas devastation of New Orleans in 2005, the venerable charity organization American Red Cross (ARC) was subjected to intense public and political scrutiny. This pressurizedRead MoreOil And Gas Industry : Exploration, Drilling, Refining, Production, Distribution, And Marketing Operations1094 Words   |  5 Pagesits interactions with stakeholders in various geographical locations. The two most important cultural issues that affect BP include diversity management and global cultural competence. The company has faced several issues with respect to global competence and the inability of the management to cope with cultural differences. BP faces several diversity management challenges due to the lack of inclusion of people belonging to specific genders or races in the workplace. Although the company does not faceRead MoreThe Ethics Of A Systematic Disaster Plan1432 Words   |  6 Pageslikelihood of the same incident from occurring again. The basis of every decision emergency managers will need to make revolve around ethical decisions when conducting the planning process. Ethics is defined as the moral principles that govern a person’s or group’s behavior (Oxford Dictionary, n.d.). As it relates to first responders and emergency managers, there is a code of ethics these individuals should follow as this oath enable them to perform their duties in such a manner that eliminates any unethicalRead MoreThe Ethics And Ethics, Prevention And Protection1459 Words   |  6 PagesThe Security professional is a must to understand the law and ethics, prevention and protection, security issues and controlling the risk associated with the programs. The report would present the governance, policies, the implementation and procedures and the standards ensures the security of the organization. The main aim is to control the risk to an extent, so the organization can withstand and protect the organization assets from being attacked are very crucial and while working with the sensitiveRead MoreCase Study : Royal Dutch Shell1003 Words   |  5 PagesUniversi dad de Ramon Lull, Barcelona. She has participated in non-governmental organizations including UNICEF, World Bank and Oxfam Intermon. This has led her in expertise about development management and human rights. Dealing with issues such as the involvement of corporations in major environm ental disasters such the oil spill that occurred in Niger delta by shell. Her title â€Å"Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria: Where Do Responsibilities End?† explains the problem of fractured responsibility coupled withRead MoreDeepwater Horizon Oil Spill1102 Words   |  5 Pagesenvironmental disaster the US has faced†, according to White House energy adviser Carol Browner. Why did this occur? The staff of the BP Deep Water Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore drilling Commission said in a report delivered said, BP â€Å"did not have policies and systems in place to ensure that decisions made to reduce costs and improve efficiency do not increase risks or diminish safety†. The management of this company failed to do many important steps that could have prevented this disaster. According

Liability for Defective Advice from an Expert System Free Essays

Introduction An expert system can be considered to have two major components. First, there is its knowledge base. This is the portion of the system that contains specialized knowledge and expertise about its domain of application. We will write a custom essay sample on Liability for Defective Advice from an Expert System or any similar topic only for you Order Now In commercial law, liability is a form of business ownership in which business owners are legally responsible for no more than the amount that they have contributed to a venture. [1] A contract is an agreement between two or more parties to do, not do, or promise something. Contracts can come in many forms — they can be oral or written, implied or express, and legally enforceable or not. [2] Negligent misstatement relates to a representation of fact, which is carelessly made, and is relied on by another party to their disadvantage. The harm of Negligent Misstatements A false statement of fact made honestly but carelessly. A statement of opinion may be treated as a statement of fact if it carries the implication that the person making it has reasonable grounds for his opinion. However, a negligent misstatement is only actionable in tort if there has been breach of a duty to take care in making the statement that has caused damage to the claimant. There is no general duty of care in making statements, particularly in relation to statements on financial matters. Responsibility for negligent misstatements is imposed only if they were made in circumstances that made it reasonable to rely on them (Hedley Byrne v Heller Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465 (HL); Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 (HL)). If a negligent misstatement induces the person to whom it was made to enter into a contract with the maker of the statement, the statement may be actionable as a term of the contract if the parties intended it to be a term or it may give rise to dama ges or rescission under the Misrepresentation Act 1967. [3] It has long been recognized that liability in Tort might arise from negligent actions, but liability for negligent misstatements and negligent advice has been less well accepted by the courts. A negligent misstatement might be defined as a representation of fact, carelessly made, which is relied on by the claimant to his disadvantage. Where the misstatement or advice is Fraudulent, this is a different matter; such misstatements may amount to the tort of deceit. In derry v peek 1888, the house of lords held that Dishonesty was an essential element of deceit, and that mere carelessness would never suffice. This judgement was taken, perhaps wrongly, to indicate that there could be no liability in tort for negligent statements; but since this judgement predated the seminal donoghue v stevenson 1932, there was no well-developed law of negligence at the time. Consequently, it is not entirely surprising that this conclusion was reached. [4] Especially where physical damage is involved, cour ts may disregard a contract in which a customer expressly assumes the risk of the supplier’s negligence. Negligence, when proven, can thus surmount almost any legal obstacle the suppliers erect. As courts and legislatures become less tolerant of negligent corporate behaviour, any business that is judged negligent will likely pay for actual damages, possibly be assessed punitive damages, and may even face regulatory or criminal proceedings. Therefore, the only secure protection is not to be negligent. Defence of the Liability Products liability involves the defence of manufacturers and sellers of allegedly defective products. I defend companies who are sued by injured plaintiffs due to alleged defects in the design or manufacture of a product. Generally, the injured parties claim that additional safety features should have been included or that a necessary part was improperly manufactured or installed on a product. [5] When a products liability claim is filed, we will work with you to prepare an intelligent, vigorous and strategically aggressive defence. We will obtain the information and documentation necessary to effectively evaluate the merits of the claim and promptly analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your adversary’s case and of your own. We will analyze insurance coverage issues and prepare and prosecute, to trial if necessary, insurance claims for any coverage you may have. [6] Not only can making a claim secure the compensation you deserve and help recover the costs of any treatment, but it can also help draw attention to the negligent manufacturer or retailer. By doing so, you may be able to prevent others from having to endure a similar experience. Where there are several incidents of personal injury related to a particular product, the manufacturer should issue a product recall. [7] Manufacturers are responsible for products sold to consumers and the safety of their customers is paramount. You should seek advice if a defective product has caused you personal injury as you may be entitled to claim compensation. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 makes manufacturers or importers of products into the EU strictly liable for personal injury caused as a consequence of any product defect. [8] For a claim based on tort law, the claimant will need to show that the defendant was negligent and in breach of its duty to take reasonable care in relation to the product. The claimant will also need to overcome other assertions by the defendant, for example that the defect in question was unforeseeable. [9] The harm of defection There are broadly speaking two approaches which could be adopted to the issue of â€Å"defectiveness†. On one view it could be said that a product is defective when it does not live up to the expectations of consumers. On the other hand a product could be said to be defective when the product is in a condition which is unreasonably dangerous to persons or to their property. The 1987 Act appears to be closer to the tort standard than the contract standard. The safety of the product is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect; and for those purposes â€Å"safety†, in relation to a product, shall include safety with respects to products comprised in that product and safety in the context of risks of damage to property, as well as in the context of risks of death or personal injury. [10] Third Parties Third-party liability insurance protects the insured from legal liability claims presented by third parties. It can be difficult to determine who party to a contract is when it is a three way relationship. For instance, there is a legal contract between International Water Service and Pennine Water. There is also a legal contract between Pennine Water and its customers. The three or more roles in the contract are different from two roles in the contract. In this case, there is no legal contract between International Water Service and the customers of Pennine Water. The case that relate to third parties is The Salvage Association v CAP Financial Services Ltd [1995]. The more important factor that I must pay attention is ‘reasonable care and skill’ in this case. For example, if we will develop this system, we must supply some compilers who have sufficient experience in the skill. If we send some no-sufficient compilers, IWS has the liability when the system is defective. S o the supplier, if acting in the course of a business, will carry out the service with: ‘reasonable care and skill’. There is another important aspect in third parties. It is Privity of Contract. Privity of Contract is a doctrine of contract law that prevents any person from seeking the enforcement of a contract, or suing on its terms, unless they are a party to that contract. Suppose there are a customer, an agent and a manufacturer. There is a subcontract between agent and manufacturer. Moreover, there is a contract between agent and customer. So we can give a definition to privity of contract. Privity refers to a connection or bond between parties to a particular transaction. Privity of contract is the relationship that exists between two or more parties to an agreement. Privity of estate exists between a lessor and a lessee, and privity of possession is the relationship between parties in successive possession of real property. References [1] Legal liability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_liability [2] What is a contract http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-contract.htm [3] Negligent misstatement http://law.jrank.org/pages/16397/negligent-misstatement-(negligent-misrepresentation-careless-statement).html [4] Negligent misstatement http://www.lawiki.org/lawwiki/Negligent_misstatement [5] Practice Insights: Products Liability Law http://legalcareers.about.com/od/legalspecialties/a/productsliab.htm [6] Products Liability Law http://www.floridalawyer.com/services-products.html [7] Making a Defective Product Claim http://www.national-accident-helpline.co.uk/accident-claims/defective-product-claims.html?s=googlegclid=CKOEzujgrKgCFUdP4QodK1f9HQ [8] Defective Products Liability Claim http://www.firstpersonalinjury.co.uk/our-specialities/defective-products-and-product-liability-claims [9] What is product liability? http://www.findlaw.co.uk/law/accidents_and_injuries/defective_and_dangerous_products/500054.html [10] Insite Law http://www.insitelawmagazine.com/ch11productlaibility.htm [11] David Bainbridge ‘Introduction to Information Technology Law’ (2008) Appendices Donoghue v Stevenson On 26 August 1928, Donoghue cost 30 minutes to Paisley by a tram. At about 8:50 pm, she was in the Wellmeadow Cafe with her friend. Her friend ordered and paid for a pear, ice and an ice-cream drink. The owner uses a tumbler to contain ginger beer and ice cream. Donoghue drank some and her friends lifted the bottle to pour the remainder of the bottle. Then, they found there is a snail which was in a state of decomposition dropped out of the bottle into the tumbler. Donoghue complained soon and her doctor diagnosed her as having gastroenteritis and being in a state of severe shock. On 9 April 1929, Donoghue brought an action against David Stevenson who is the water manufacturer in Paisley. Donoghue claimed 500 pounds as damages for injuries sustained. Caparo Industries plc v Dickman A company called Fidelity plc, which is a manufactures of electrical equipments, was the target of a takeover by Caparo Industries plc. Fidelity did not run well. In March 1984 Fidelity had issued a profit warning, which had halved its share price. In June 1984, the annual accounts were done with the help of the accountant Dickman. Caparo found that Fidenlity’s accounts were in an even worse state than had been revealed by the directors or the auditors. Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Heller Partners Ltd Hedley Byrne was a firm of advertising agents. Easipower Ltd is a customer who put in a large order. Hedley wanted to check the information, which includes financial position and credit-worthiness. Heller Partners Ltd replied in a letter that was headed, â€Å"without responsibility on the part of this bank†. Easipower said that consider good for its ordinary business engagements. Derry v peek (1888) The defendant tram company advertised in its prospectus that it would employ steam power, and intimated that it had the authority of the Board of Trade to do so. In the end, the Board refused consent to steam power, and the company was wound up. The claimant investor brought an action in the tort of deceit, which ultimately failed in the HouseOfLords. While there was no doubt that the defendants’ claim was unfounded, the House held that deceit required actual Dishonesty — Negligence, however culpable was not enough. How to cite Liability for Defective Advice from an Expert System, Essay examples

Commercialization of Organ Transplants free essay sample

I’ve recently done research regarding the commercialization of Organ Transplants. I’ve found many arguments for and against this subject. Some individuals find the act to be unethical, and other’s think it will save lives. The problem is that a new policy was proposed to allow sale of organs by consenting individuals to patients in need and to medical institutions. When it comes to the subject of human organs, there are a few ethical standards to consider. There are religious standards, social norms, ethical code, morals, and policies in which we should follow. Critics argue that permitting organs to be bought and sold is unethical. Meaning that to commercialize organs transplants would violate an ethical code and social norm. During my research I’ve found many pros and cons concerning the commercialization of Organ Transplants. One of the pros would be that it shortens the waiting time for those in need of transplants. We will write a custom essay sample on Commercialization of Organ Transplants or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page For example, if you have been on a waiting list to receive a kidney and there are more donated organs you will receive one quicker to save your life. Another pro for commercializing organ transplants are an individual’s rights to have the freedom to do what they wish with their body organs. Some people might equate this example to abortion stating that the government shouldn’t be able to tell you what to do with your body. During NOTA (National Organ Transplant) act of 1984 â€Å"one commentator has argued that the very existence of a law forbidding alienation of organs paradoxically portrays the human body as an article of commerce that lies within the purview of Congressional power and would otherwise be subject to sale on the market. (Gwen, Mayes) There are some more pros to these organ transplants such as money incentives for those in financial strain, and tax benefits for the government. Anything that can be sold on the black market, would be more beneficial if made legal and taxed. Despite all of the pros there are some cons that have dire consequences. By commercializing organ transplants some ethical codes are violated. Apart from the fact that selling these organs would be against federal law because it was banned by congress. Also, despite the fact that this goes against public policy we have to evaluate the ethical wrongs. Many religions have certain beliefs about the body being the â€Å"temple of the lord† and not defiling that temple. So, to commit such an act would violate their traditions. For example, the Jews believe in being buried with all of their body parts. Also, critics argue that to allow commercialization of these organs will encourage criminal behavior. In our society there are criminal acts made because of financial struggles i. e. ; prostitution, and human trafficking. I think we all can agree that selling human organs and thinking of them as a commodity violates the social norm. There may seem to be more pros than cons when it comes to commercializing organ transplants but I’m against it. It doesn’t matter if an action only hurt’s a few people the fact remains that it’s unethical. Society needs to evaluate the moral principle in this situation. We can’t allow human organs to be sold as commodities for money, personal gain, or just because we can do what we want with our bodies. For example, suicide is illegal because it’s immoral even if it is your body. Also, you can be locked up or discharged from the military for causing yourself bodily harm and this isn’t much different. By donating your organs you can risk sickness, and even death. Also, if one person donates an organ and the other organ gives out this will pose another health problem. We shouldn’t agree with anything that violates any moral standards, or that would promote unethical behavior. For example, it’s not ethical to commit murder in order to save a friends life. Well, then it’s not okay to put other people at a health risk to save another patients life on a waiting list. Also, this policy would make the commercialization of organ transplants worldwide which can cause health issues. These transplants can bring diseases to people who are in need of just an organ which will make them sicker. â€Å"According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2005 93,000 kidney, liver, and heart transplants were performed globally. There is evidence that the medical practices surrounding commercial organ transplantation are sub-standard. Medical complications are common, as is the transmission of infectious diseases, including HIV and hepatitis B and C. † (R. W. , Evans) Some argue that this won’t happen if we regulate transplantation. For example, policies should be made to run tests on donors and make sure their organs are healthy before accepting. However, this will not fully eradicate the disease problem because a criminal market will be produced after rejection of unhealthy organs. They will not have the technology a hospital has to perform these tests and will accept any donor. Also, criminals have hired doctors in the past who have lost their license but have the knowledge of doing these transplants that will infect others. I’m sure these black market organs will be sold at a lower price as well. I believe there are other ethical ways in which we can fix medical issues in this country and financial issues without violating any standards. For example, stem cell research and medical projects are trying to find ways to reproduce organs in order to shorten waiting lists. â€Å"A growing number of patients are waiting for an organ transplant, and alternatives to increase the donor supply are in constant demand. However, simply stated, advances in biotechnology have generated uses and needs for bodily tissues that were unfathomable until recent years. † (Gwen Mayes) Although people may debate why the government does allow these labs to research using cells? Not all of them are using human cells. Biotechnologist have used animal tissue with a mixture of human cells to grow organs. These practices are claimed to be much safer and made in a controlled environment and don’t have many risks. Unlike, the commercialization of Organ Transplants that can’t be regulated at all times and has more risks. In my conclusion, by following the law banning the commercialization of organs you will be ethically and morally right in this situation. Morals must be kept in place to separate right from wrong. I believe behaving unmoral for money breaks society down to a bunch heartless robots or criminals. It is our moral responsibility to make sure our actions don’t harm anyone. The needs of the greater do not outweigh the needs of the few. Morals are the backbone and the core of society. The normative theory that best supports my arguments is Kant’s theory. Kant believed in inviolable morals such as the good will, the notion of duty, and the nature of imperatives. According to Kant, â€Å"The Good Will is good by virtue of the fact that it is the will to follow the Moral Law. (Immanuel, Kant) For example, the law concerning the commercialization of organ transplants are illegal and if you follow this law you are doing the good will. To make decisions based on an ethical code is our sense of duty. We must consider to do good rather than to do the wrong we see every day. We don’t sell humans and we shouldn’t see their parts. If Kant were here he would look at his as making humans a means to an end. Meaning we are such an unethical society that we commercialize human organs for money and it’s wrong. It is obvious, that the risks of these transplants are higher than the advantages and we should leave this practice banned. References: